AI-generated papers and reviews are flooding major conferences and hurting trust in scientific research.

Fill a paper with gobbledygook, add some fake charts, slap on a title dense with highfalutin scientific jargon, and -- voilà!--- a highfalutin conference may actually accept it. That’s what happened ...

arXiv, a preprint site that publishes papers before peer review, has updated its procedures for handling papers in the computer science category, making it a requirement that review papers and ...

The news: A new AI model for summarizing scientific literature can now assist researchers in wading through and identifying the latest cutting-edge papers they want to read. On November 16, the Allen ...

Artificial intelligence peer reviewers recommend the acceptance of unsound papers created entirely by AI more than 80% of the time, a new study has found. The authors of the analysis, posted Oct. 20 ...

If writing scholarly computer science papers is something on which you’re reviewed at the end of the year, have we got a site for you. Unless, of course, you enjoy writing them, then by all means ...

Reading scientific papers is a tough job. It might contain language and sections that you might not understand, and not all of it would be interesting to you. My colleague Tristan is great at ...

AI research in question as author claims to have written over 100 papers on AI that one expert calls a ‘disaster’ A single person claims to have authored 113 academic papers on artificial intelligence ...